ailbhe: (Default)
[personal profile] ailbhe
Every so often, when I am particularly pleased with my life or my house, I remember the NCT coffee morning in my front room, where everyone lamented having to go back to work, and when I said "It's one reason we bought such a small house, we wanted to be able to manage on one salary." The response? It would be lovely, but they couldn't cope with the drop in standard of living.

I've often wondered whether they'd have said it if we'd been in one of their houses, which were all slightly more than twice the size of mine, and considerably more, um, groomed, whatever the grooming equivalent for houses is.

But then I go and sit in the garden and eat bagels again. So that's ok.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 07:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pogodragon.livejournal.com
I suspect I live in a bigger house than you do, and I am pretty certain that those women would think it needs lots of 'work doing to it' (I watched Location^3 last night, I know the words to use).

I really don't equate size of house with standard of living, or state of decor, or newness of kitchen/bathroom/landscaping/car with standard of living either.

We made the choices we made to be able to do what we want to do and spiffying up the house beyond what *we* need for it to be happily habitable is not something we choose to do.

I think there may be a long post in there about the necessity of making choices in life and being able to see clearly enough to know what your own priorities are, not the ones which are imposed by other people's expectations.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] schmoomom.livejournal.com
All of this. Excellent comment.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pogodragon.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 08:37 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snorkel-maiden.livejournal.com
I agree with [livejournal.com profile] pogodragon; the size of your house (or it's level of groominess) is really only one fairly unimportant aspect of overall standard of living. There are so many other factors that go into it as well, and most of them have nothing to do with money / finances. Though that's how I personally judge it, not how the BBC or whoever formulate they surveys you see sometimes.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] snorkel-maiden.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 08:29 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:07 am (UTC)
ext_37604: (domestic bliss)
From: [identity profile] glitzfrau.livejournal.com
Wow. What a pack of morons. As a fellow small-house-dweller, I too have received the odd "well, of course your house is more humble than my family's, but obviously it suits you" comment, and my blood boils. Thing about large houses? You need to buy more stuff to put in them. Small houses are furnished in a flash, and then you can stop spending money and start enjoying your garden. At least, so I am told.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ai731.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 01:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hopeforyou.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-22 10:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yiskah.livejournal.com
One of my best friends had her first child in November, and when I last saw her she was lamenting having to go back to work in September - she's a corporate lawyer and is generally out of the home at least 12 hours a day when she's working, so she will be going from being around her daughter (my ungoddaughter!) 24/7 to only seeing her awake at weekends. She's never really enjoyed her job, but when I asked her whether she'd considered not going back to work, her answer was, "but we couldn't survive on [husband]'s salary." It's true that my friend earns more than her husband, but I can pretty much guarantee that her husband earns at least twice my highest ever salary (he's a finance manager in London). I know that children are (or can be) expensive, but even before they had the baby, I really couldn't see much difference in our standards of living. They had an objectively 'nicer' flat, but they didn't seem to eat out more (they never had time for it) or go on holiday/travel more - I think for them, and for a lot of people it's not so much about an objectively perceptible standard of living, but about a feeling of security. And this is why I am (irritatingly, Pollyannaishly) glad that I have earned a pittance over the past few years, because now I know how little I can live on and how earning the national average would feel like luxury.

[Disclaimer: I am all for mothers working outside the home, and would almost certainly do so myself if I became a mother - but I am sad that my friend is making the choice due to perceived financial necessity rather than because she really wants to.)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com
it's not so much about an objectively perceptible standard of living, but about a feeling of security

This is actually why I've got more determinedly rather than less leftwing as I've got slightly older and richer. I realised that I was thinking that if I'm financially responsible for my children's education, my parents' care, my own old age, mine and my family's healthcare - I simply can't earn enough money to be secure. All those things can literally cost hundreds of thousands of pounds: I really feel like I need the absolute highest possible salary if the alternative is my kids not being able to afford university or adequate medical care.

On the other hand, tell me that the state is going to provide healthcare, for my retirement and subsidise my children's education so it's affordable to all, and you know, all an extra £10k means is slightly nicer holidays, better wine and a slightly more stylish sofa. Nothing that really improves your quality of life more than the ability to be home by 5.30pm.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yiskah.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 09:08 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 10:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 11:22 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] rmc28 - Date: 2010-05-21 12:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] pauamma - Date: 2010-05-21 01:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 01:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 09:36 am (UTC)
juliet: My dog Sidney jumping off the bandstand in the park (sidney jumping)
From: [personal profile] juliet
And this is why I am (irritatingly, Pollyannaishly) glad that I have earned a pittance over the past few years, because now I know how little I can live on and how earning the national average would feel like luxury.

A lot of this is, I think, about expectations & how you set them or allow them to be set around you. Ten years ago I was doing a self-funded MPhil and surviving on next to no money (enough so that it was genuinely stressful & contributed to my bout of situational depression, so that is kind of my lower limit for such things; but I did get by). Three years ago I was earning over three times that (which, ahem, was still not a *lot*, but comfortable!), and at that time I was thinking about going part-time and trying to work out how much I could 'afford' to lose in earnings, and unconvinced about whether it was feasible. Then I quit my job to do a bit of travelling, earnt not-very-much again for 10 month, and came back with the attitude that actually I *can* get by on not-much-at-all, and I'd rather have the time than the money. (So now I do a little bit of freelance writing and spend the rest of the time on Other Stuff.)

But the thing is, I don't think all that much *changed* between 10 yrs ago (when my 7-yrs-later salary would have seemed ludicrously extravagant), 3 yrs ago (when it just seemed comfortable, and not *much* more than I 'needed'), and now (when it's back to seeming quite extravagant :) ). I just got used to the things that go along with each of those states, and that became 'normal'. So it's partly security, and partly spending-to-what's-available & not necessarily seeing which parts of that are more optional.

What your friends are doing can have an impact, too -- the times when I do feel 'poor' currently are when I am out with mates who don't need to keep an eye on what the drinks are costing. And since most of my friends work full-time in reasonable jobs, this is most people I hang out with. Other than the anarchist activist types :)

(Then I remind myself that *I* can go sit in the park in the sunshine today if I want to, & I stop feeling poor.)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ai731.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 01:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] pauamma - Date: 2010-05-21 01:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] juliet - Date: 2010-05-24 12:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] pauamma - Date: 2010-05-24 01:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-changeling.livejournal.com
It's such a continuum, both in expectations, and what constitutes a decent standard of living.

I have friends who hated going back to work... but they need to support the debt from the mortgage. Sometimes, it's for a small house, they planned for, sometimes it's a big house, the like as it has status.

I do have problems with women in no significant debt, full time jobs, three holidays a year, abroad, three cars in the house, spending most of their salary on expensive top whack child care, and then they whinge they'd prefer to be at home.

I usually want to slap them.

I have no problems with women who need to go back to work, as that's who they are.

And I'm desperately sympathetic, to the ones with no choice - working to put food on the table, desperate to be home. *sigh* There but for a heart attack, go I.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com
A lot of women whinge about wanting to be home with the children because they think that is what's expected of them (and they're not wrong). Working mothers get enough shit that it's not unreasonable for them to want to deflect some of it by extravagantly protesting about how much they love their kids, how their career is in no way as important to them as being mothers etc. etc.

The reality is that in the Catch-22 world of modern motherhood, there is no way for anyone to be happy (feature, not bug): if you admit you like your job and are greatful to get away from the family for a few hours, you're a bad mom. If you admit that you're happy being at home, gardening, cooking and playing with the children, you're lazy and a bad role model.

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] taimatsu - Date: 2010-05-21 05:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-changeling.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 11:00 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 11:19 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-changeling.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 12:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] pauamma - Date: 2010-05-21 01:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-changeling.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 03:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] pauamma - Date: 2010-05-21 03:49 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 09:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 1ngi.livejournal.com
It would be interesting to see how they compared 'standard of living' to 'quality of life'. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 09:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clarahippy.livejournal.com
It's all relative really, my over-riding house ambition at the moment (and for the next few years at the very least) is to um, have a house with a garden! Also I am feeling a bit glad now I didn't do NCT classes because I really get quite enough unnecessary sympathy already. My life is certainly not perfect but it has the most important bits!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] 1ngi.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 09:37 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] cangetmad.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 09:43 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-changeling.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 03:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feanelwa.livejournal.com
Any small drop looks like the Grand Canyon to somebody who has decided not to look at the ground anymore. Also, I suspect they are measuring standard of living more in terms of stuff and less in terms of relationships than you do.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 10:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com
I don't think anyone's ever actually commented aboutthe smallness of my flat (except for me!), but whenever people talk about fancy schmancy big houses in the country and that, I always think, and often say, "god, the extra vacuuming alone would kill me".

It really is about quality of life, not quantity. But it's also legitimately true that for many people, keeping up with the neighbours and climbing the aspiration ladder *is* part of what contributes to their quality of life. Bucolic family centred peace is no more a fit-all than ambitious career oriented striving.

For me, like for biascut, the relatively small part of my identity that is invested in making decent amounts of money is about gaining a sense of security for the future, because I have this whole "I am alone in the world and there is no one to help me, whaaa" thing going.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 10:47 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 10:35 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 10:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] helenprev.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 12:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 12:31 pm (UTC)
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
From: [personal profile] rmc28
I hope I've never made you feel like that. I think your house is lovely.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] helenprev.livejournal.com
Enough people have made the slightly barbed comments about my house over the years that when people say nice things like 'oh but your house has a lovely welcoming atmosphere', I don't believe them in the slightest.

I am needing to work on my own attitude and thinking about it all quite a lot at the moment - like how much do I want to tidy up and decorate a bit for myself and my children, and how much am I just feeling I should because of other people's perceptions.

I know I've gone off at a bit of a tangent from the standard of living and money angle but it does sort of all tie in together, in my head anyway.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 12:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the0lady.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 02:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 01:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gloriap.livejournal.com
You have a perfect attitude. I love your posts because you spend your life living, not in the search for more, bigger, and better. The world would be a lot nicer with more women like you and families like yours.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-21 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pocketnaomi.livejournal.com
I wish there were anything in a safe area of Seattle that we could afford on one salary. Some one-room apartments, maybe. I don't think we could function in one total room with two kids, especially who can't go to bed with anyone moving around in the room.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pocketnaomi.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 03:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pocketnaomi.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-21 04:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ai731.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-05-22 12:54 am (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-22 10:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I haven't read all the comments, but I LOVE your house. It's the only one out of all my friends houses where I can see/feel/hear/touch that the children really do come first, or at least equal. It's a truly shared space. Thank you. Plus your comments make me feel better about ours, which although is bigger is considerably less groomed than yours :)

Rachel

(no subject)

Date: 2010-05-24 06:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiggsybabes.livejournal.com
The year 6 class today were learning about salaries & tax (why, oh why was I never taught about such important things at school?) When I said that my husband was a software engineer & the TA said that he probably earns more than both her & her nurse husband put together, I did have to point out that his salary supported 3 people for 3 years & 4 for a further 5 as I was a stay at home parent. When we talked a little about what salaries are used to pay for, her house is worth £40k more than ours in a similar sort of area, so it is no doubt larger & grander, so, like you, we have bought a house that was available in the price range of 1 salary, not 2. We may be able to upgrade in 4 & a bit years time when I'm a teacher, but it's not the be all & end all.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
OSZAR »